From: Sean Kennedy <skennedy@educause.edu<mailto:skennedy@educause.edu>>
Date: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:18 AM
To: Beth Klingner <bklingner@pace.edu<mailto:bklingner@pace.edu>>
Subject: 2013 NERCOMP Annual Conference session evaluation summary

Dear Beth,

Thank you again for your participation in the 2013 NERCOMP Annual Conference! As promised, below is a summary of the evaluations from your session “E-Terns: What Every Campus Needs to Pull Off a Technology Revolution.” We hope that you will find it useful for enhancing future presentations.

While findings based on a limited number of responses (fewer than 10) are more difficult to interpret and can be unreliable, feedback and reflective thinking about your session lend to continuous improvement.  EDUCAUSE is committed to providing resources to support your professional development; therefore we invite you to explore the resources in the evolving Speaker Resources Hub<http://www.educause.edu/conferences-events/speaker-concierge> and specifically to review the section “Decode Your Session Evaluation<http://www.educause.edu/conferences-events/educause-speaker-concierge/leverage-your-speaking-engagement/decode-your-evaluation>.”

Thank you again for your contribution! It was a pleasure working with you, and I hope to have the opportunity to do so again in the future.

Sean Kennedy
EDUCAUSE Speaker Liaison


SESSION CONTENT QUESTIONS

Overall evaluation of presentation
Excellent 64%
Good 36%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

Presented as described in the abstract
Excellent 71%
Good 29%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

Organized in logical, coherent way
Excellent 62%
Good 38%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

Key points supported with breadth and depth
Excellent 57%
Good 43%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

Clearly stated significance of project/area of work that points to future use
Excellent 71%
Good 29%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

Appropriate selection of resources/handouts
Excellent 57%
Good 43%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

Allowed sufficient time for Q&A
Excellent 57%
Good 43%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

SESSION DELIVERY/SPEAKER QUESTIONS

Knowledge of topic
Excellent 64%
Good 36%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

Engaged the audience
Excellent 71%
Good 29%
Fair 0%
Poor 0 %

Clearly introduced and reinforced key points
Excellent 64%
Good 36%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

Effectively used slides/visuals to organize and display content
Excellent 64%
Good 36%
Fair 0%
Poor 0%

14 evaluation forms were returned for this session.

COMMENTS:

Including the student who is currently an e-Tern was a great idea. Having a student's perspective was valuable. Also, the video was terrific.


I would have liked to hear more about funding ideas for creating projects like these in tough economic times.

The student was as impressive as the speakers-they shoul dbe very proud of their program.


This was very interesting. Would have loved to hear more from the students about their experience.

Good use of student presenter.

Very good delivery of material. How would this program scale up to include more students and a bigger program? That might give it more depth.